Providing real, useful intellectual access to reference materials from current library pages

(by Christina Pikas) Nov 13 2017

Those of use who study or teach about scientific information have this model of how it goes:



(this image is lifted from my dissertation, fwiw, and it more or less reproduces Garvey & Griffith, 1967; Garvey & Griffith, 1972)

Conference papers (in many fields) are supposed to be more cutting edge - really understandable to people in the field with a deep understanding but who need that icing on the cake of what's new. Journal articles are for more or less after substantive parts of the work are complete and take a while for review and publication (letters journals are supposed to be much faster), and then monographs and textbooks are more for when the information is more stable. More recently, there's a category of shorter books that are sort of like extended reviews but are faster than monographs. Morgan & Claypool, Foundations and Trends, and the new series coming from Cambridge University Press (no endorsement here) are examples. (Note the model omits things like protocols, videos, and datasets).

Reference books are even slower moving. They are used to look up fairly stable information. Here are some examples:

  • encyclopedias (and not just Worldbook, but Kirk-Othmer, Ullman's, and technical encylopedias)
  • dictionaries
  • handbooks (not just for engineers!)
  • directories
  • gazetteers (well, maybe less so for the sciences), maps
  • guidebooks (like in geology, biology)
  • sometimes things like catalogs...

You may think, hey, all I really need are the journal articles and Google and maybe Wikipedia. Or at least publishers and librarians think you're thinking that. And reference books are sort of disappearing. It doesn't make any sense to devote precious real estate to the print versions and the online versions are super expensive and also often not used.

The thing is that these tools are really still needed and they have condensed very useful information down into small(er) packages. If you're concerned about efficiency and authority then starting with a reference book is probably a good idea if you want an overview or to look up a detail.

The publishers don't want to lose our money so they're taking a few different approaches. Some are making large topical digital libraries that combine journal articles, book chapters, and reference materials. This can be really good - you can look up information on a topic when you're reading a journal article or look up a definition, etc. You can start with an overview from an encyclopedia and then dive deeper to learn what's new. The problem from a librarian and user point of view is that the best information may come from multiple different publishers and you just won't get that. You won't get a recommendation for someone else's product.

Another thing publishers are doing is to make reference materials more dynamic. First, they can charge you more and and more frequently. Second, even if the updates are quite small, it makes the resource more attractive to potential users to have a recent date updated. One publisher in particular has commissioned sort of a portal approach that gathers materials from various places and has commissioned new overviews.

There's a tool to sort of search across more traditional reference materials, but... meh.

Of course if you have a well-developed model of what type of reference tool will have your needed information, then you can use the catalog (subjects like engineering - handbooks, engineering - encyclopedias). Back in the day, I wrote about how senior engineers gathered and created their own handbooks from pieces they'd found useful over time.

So here's where librarians come in. I've never taught the basic undergrad science welcome-to-the-library class (I attended one <cough> years ago), so I really don't know if they go over these distinctions or not. So that leaves our guides to try to get people to the best source of information. Guides that are merely laundry lists of tools by format/type are frowned upon because they are generally not useful. That's what we used to do though: here's a list of dictionaries, here's a list of encyclopedias... etc. What we try to do more now is make them problem based. Somewhat easier in like business: need to understand an industry? need to look up a company? Also maybe in materials science and or chemistry (although SciFinder and Reaxys' way of doing properties may be supplanting).

Ok, so beyond the difficulty of expressing the value of each of these tools and in which situations they are useful, we have the affordances of our websites and the tools that produce them. Most are database driven now, which makes sense because you don't want to have to go a million places to update a url. Except... one reference might be useful for one purpose in one guide, and another in another, and then how do you get that to display? How do you balance chatty to educate when needed verses quick links for when not?

Also, do you list a digital library collection of handbooks or, more commonly, monographs mixed with handbooks, as a database? As what?

The reviews and overviews and encyclopedias... do you call them out separately? By series?

Users sometimes happen upon reference books from web searches - but that's mostly things like encyclopedias. If they need an equation or a property... well, if they're an engineer they probably know exactly what handbook... so then, I guess, if they don't have their own copy, they would use the catalog and get to the current edition which we may have online. Getting a phase diagram or other property of a material - I'm guessing users would probably start online but for some materials we have entire references (like titanium, aluminum... and then things like hydrazine).

I'm thinking we could have on an engineering guide, a feed from the catalog with engineering - handbooks? Likewise a feed physics-handbooks?  What about things like encyclopedia of optics. Call out "major reference works" and then catalog feed of [subject] - handbooks|encyclopedias|etc....

OR.. hey... what about the shelf display model:

But, instead of all books, just the books for that guide that match [guide name] -- encyclopedia|dictionary|handbook, etc.

What other methods can we use?

No responses yet

#AcWriMo: Late start

(by Christina Pikas) Nov 04 2017

I'm going to try to get re-invigorated with writing this month. For me, it's of course not academic writing but scholarly writing.

Here's what I'm working on - and this is all outside of work stuff:

  • dissertation > first journal article describing the framework and testing it
  • dissertation > second journal article or maybe conference article looking specifically at longitudinal changes/evolution of use of twitter at science conferences (also want to eventually update and publish a longitudinal look at the continuing role of blogs, and of scholarly informal communication in general)
  • short article on using k-means longitudinal clustering for citation trajectory modeling (this I really want to do - more motivated by this than the others!)
  • article based on the work that generated the METRICS17 poster - bibliometric institutional profiles.

Goal: work every day, and at least 2 hours on Saturdays. Really, just get writing!

Yes, I should pick one of the above articles instead of doing all these at once. Going to try to meet up with advisor around turkey day so there's a short goal - we're working only on the first one so that *should* be a priority even if less fun.

No responses yet

ASIST2017: Information Use Papers

(by Christina Pikas) Nov 01 2017

Ma Cui-Chang and CaoShu-Jin - Identifying structural genre conventions across academic web document for information use

Swales model for research articles

Move 1 Establishing a territory
Move 2 Establishing a niche
Move 3 Occupying the niche

rhetorical organization patterns - disciplines, different information uses

sources for development: rhetorical objectives of the genres > linguistic clues > move analysis, writing rules genre research

academic blog post, online encyclopedia, research articles

corpus - 81 documents, 2015, Chinese documents with kw "citation analysis"

raters - interrater reliability 80-100%

Taxonomy identified and validated

q: how will you use this? will you use machine or automated clustering based on this.

q: can you elaborate on information units you found on the web or in web documents vs. formal publications.

a: main difference in how organized. also Swales is developed from written English articles.

q: mentioned Swales was developed to help train junior users, could your taxonomy help further with teaching

 

Devendra Dilip Potnis (speaker), Kanchan Deosthali, Janine Pino - Investigating barriers to using information in electronic resources: a study with e-book users

Motivation: spend money on electronic resources, but they're underused. Goal: to investicate barriers to using information in ebooks

Key findings - 60 barriers. Categories:

  • ereaders (16)
  • features of ebooks (20)
  • psychological (7), somatic(3), cognitive status (6)
  • cost
  • policies

different actors - things about the users and things about the environment, system, vendors

uses Wilson (2000)'s definition of using information - both physically accessing, as well as mental schemas and emotional responses

4 broad stages of information use- searching, managing, processing, applying information

Lots of previous studies - their main difference is how they look at use of information instead of "value".

They did a survey of LIS students (n=25) [sigh... this is a real and important topic, but sigh]

These participants also might have more insight into use of information, what's going on in libraries, etc.

Great quotes - flipping pages waiting for a page to load - breaks concentration. Not immersive. Policies don't let download. Poor text quality.

Mapped barriers to information use stages.  For example psychological barriers prevent information processing. Technical barriers prevent use of information

"due to a series of unavoidable barriers, respondents who originally intended to use ebooks for utilitarian purposes end up using this electronic resource mostly for hedonistic reasons " (pleasure reading, but not reference)

contributions - insight into adoption, why a negative perception. also if hiring a new librarian, will they have a negative attitude toward ebooks.

q: plans to go bigger with this

a: not really - so disheartening [welcome to my world] - but is planning a bigger hci study

q/comment: need to really differentiate between scholarly and leisure reading and even within scholarly, engaged with as monograph vs no drm pdf per chapter engaged on a per-chapter basis almost as a journal article

q/c: some have advanced annotation and highlighting features of which users may be unaware

Ayoung Yoon - Role of Communication in Data Reuse

Secondary use of data - not for the original purpose, and generally not by original collector of data

not a simple one-step process, transfer of knowledge, "social process" interactions and communications with other relevant parties (Martin, 2014)

who are involved, why and how)

past studies - transferring information about context of data, difficult to know what contextual information is important for unknown possible reusers, level of skills and tacit knowledge of reuser

strategies - documentation (inherently insufficient, not everything can be transferred), communication with producers (formal or informal)

38 - quantitative data reusers in social work and public health. Identified from scholarly databases using "secondary data" or "secondary analysis"

not a linear process - discovery, selecting, understanding, analyses, manuscripts

purpose of interaction communication - searching, interacting, problem solving

search is complicated - no one place to look, data may be dated, rely on established network, have a "data talk"

interaction/communication - learning process, collaboration and mentoring process, "not just access to the data but more importantly, access to people", "how to get around challenges"

problem solving - "knowing other people who were closely working with the data" "talking among ourselves" give reusers "confidence" about solving issues. Also working with data professionals and statisticians "if the problem was really me or the data"

Limitation of communication around data - have to be part of the network to have information needed to access data - peripheral and junior researchers. Unsuccessful interaction with data producers (no answers, partial answers, busy, contact person may be project manager and many not know)

communication is not always necessary for reusers - if it's well documented, known, and the reuser is experienced.

important to support this communication around data - most libraries do not deal with this but deal with mandates and sharing.

q: communication around data among reusers - not with producers - role for platform to support?

a: extended (great) - she did see that in her work. lots of discussion at conferences and within networks among reusers. OTOH, some participants hit a wall when they didn't get a response from producer and didn't have anyone else to ask next. Library is not seen in facilitating this but would be helpful if they could. Platform facilitating could be useful, too.

 

No responses yet

ASIST2017: Top Ranked Papers

(by Christina Pikas) Oct 31 2017

Re(a)d Wedding: A Case Study Exploring Everyday Information Behaviors of the Transmedia Fan
Eric Forcier

Information behavior lens to study how transmedia fans negotiate... . Fans  - production and consumption. De Certeau - everyday life practice + Floridi - infosphere, "information is our environment" = postdigital everyday life practice

Fandom "regular, emotionally involved consumption of a given popular narrative" Sandvoss 2007

transmedia - media-hopping network of intertextualities.

Studied Game of Thrones - Red Wedding

engagement - Nahl 2007

para-active engagement Evans 2016 (like para text)

updating the "iceberg theory" Hemmingway

hyperdiegsis "creation of a vast and detailed narrative space only a fraction of which is ever directly seen or encountered within the text (Hills 2002)

postdigital reading

takeaway - everyday information behavior model of transmedia fan

Before Information Literacy [or, Who Am I, as a Subject-Of-(Information)-Need?]
Ron Day

Lots yesterday about fake news - his is on that topic.

 

Affordances and Constraints in the Online Identity Work of LGBTQ+ Individuals
Vanessa Kitzie

Technologies enable and constrain - profiles on social media, search results - important for identity work.

No utopian view - online reflects structural disadvantages of

internet isn't necessarily emancipatory for LGBTQ+

sociomateriality - theorizes imbrication of technologies and users

affordance - example - OKCupid's body type selections

30 interviews with LGBTQ+ individuals. Critical incident. Emic/etic coding miles&huberman 1994. Pseudonyms and preferred pronouns

identity expression - ways to play with that they can't do offline. Example: Jamie  - viewed as female offline, but presents as male online, images, profile details "catfishing". Can't do offline. Even online can be seen as deceptive. Authenticity is required by things like "real name policies" but

visibility - natural language queries and search box aesthetic. Lacked language to express identity got some results to help. OTOH - results often stigmatize. Difficult to get a search results set without someone being shot, etc. (do not want these reports hidden, but just ...) Because ranking depends in part on popularity, reflects larger society - the search engine has agency and does things unintended by engineers

anonymity - desired due to heternormative contexts. Craigslist vs OKCupid - scary to post picture with gay identity but craigslist has its own scary. 4  c h a n board - anon but use special codes in names to create pseudonyms and trust.

Implications - design for stress cases.

Limitations - qualitative, assumptions about access to technology.

 

Grouped questions:

for Eric:

how common are these transmedia fans?

a: transmedia fans vs. super fans - different.

 

No responses yet

ASIST2017: Technology as Humanism (plenary)

(by Christina Pikas) Oct 31 2017

Technology as Humanism: Rebooting the Digital Revolution

William Powers, MIT Media Lab

Border of science/humanities is where innovation happens and that's where he sees us.

Library - he thinks of accessibility, order, quiet, control

Researched the "death" of the book.

Shakespeare - Hamlet - "tables" - like dry erase notebook. Lots of discussion at the time about information overload with all the books newly available. "Hamlet's Blackberry: Why Paper is Eternal Shorenstein Center 2006 led to book Building a good life in the digital age. Digital maximalism - more digitally connected you are, the better.

Philosophers of Screens (7 dead white males)

  • Socrates - the alphabet will rot your mind! if it's fixed on the page
  • Seneca - "restless energy of a hunted mind" Internal mental exercises
  • Gutenberg - sort of relic-looking selfie sticks with mirrors so pilgrims in crowds could experience the relics
  • Shakespeare - "this distracted globe" (speaking of his own head and those of the audience)
  • Franklin - "all new tools require some practice before we can become expert in the use of them"
  • Thoreau - failed inner life reflected in too much mail (like if you're doing it right, in his opinion, you don't need to talk to anyone else if you have a good inner life)
  • McLuhan - "how are we to get out of the maelstrom create your own ingenuity"

Internet sabbath - useful

Books since his - Carr Shallows, Schulte Overwhelmed, Newport Deep Work, Turkle Conversation....

Digital detox.

Turns out print books are doing find and ebook sales slip. Millenials like paper diaries and notebooks.

Leo Marx - Machine in the garden - "mechanistic habits of the mind"

Working now with people interested in bias in algorithms and in getting stories

Q: social machines, really?

A: not robots, but humans and machines and aspects of humans with machines

.. see great tweets from Kaitlin Costello

 

also great question - you're saying some utopia or ideal, but before there were a lot of have-nots and disadvantaged...

 

 

No responses yet

ASIST2017: Making A Case for Open Research: Implications for Reproducibility and Transparency

(by Christina Pikas) Oct 31 2017

Came in super late (darn traffic - left home, 30 mi away, 2 hours before getting here)

Caught the end of Erik Mitchell and Edward M. Corrado - they did a survey of JASIST authors and the responses were bleak. Suprising only like 25% or so had an IRB? Few shared data or had data management plans. Few shared code. Few really did that much about open access.

John M. Budd: A retraction walks into the bar. Bartender says: what will you have? Retraction says: Nevermind. and doesn't leave the bar.

Retractions - lots. And lots of things that had been cited, the citations were substantive. Marking of retractions is poor. Work to be done and presented next year

Audience discussion:

Q: Is anxiety an issue? some researchers have been attacked for sharing data.

A: Well in qualitative, it isn't appropriate to really talk about reproducible

A: We didn't see this anxiety in our work, but maybe a qualitative study would

Q: Question about the result that said lack of consent was a reason not to share. Audience member was member of a project that had to go through specific consent forms to see if data could be used for new protocols.

(fwiw, I did actually reveal names of my participants in my dissertation research but I went back and re-asked consent giving examples of how it would be done)

Q: IRBs or research sites requiring destruction of data

Q: Works at a DOE national lab -and they have strict requirements for DMPs. Isn't that going to be more the norm now with funder requirements

A: Not evenly held accountable. Different agencies coming online at different points.

A: Someone from DOT - we're just now having funding calls that have this requirement. There are new requirements for PII data and DMP. They are part of the compliance chain at the National Transportation Library. They haven't gotten any data back in for it yet. It will be that you will be ineligible for future funding if you do not provide identifiers (this might be part of one contract broken into blocks). Many if not most large funders of science - Gates, Wellcome, other funders requiring.

Q: if I do a qualitative study of how people like riding buses, would the interview transcripts be deposited and available?

A: Yes - but probably some sort of de-identification, compilation, anonymization, etc. (I added this part).

 

No responses yet

ASIST2017: Social Media Papers session

(by Christina Pikas) Oct 30 2017

Fei Shu (speaker) & Stefanie Haustein - On the Citation Advantage of Tweeted Papers at the Journal Level

Previous research - twitter exposure leads to an overall increase of citations. Correlation is weak. Low social media impact in countries where Twitter, for example, is limited or blocked.

Research questions - compare normalized citation rate of articles shared on twitter with similar papers from the same year. 22% of WoS papers are tweeted? (talking fast!) This causes problems - so look at journal level, control for journal, discipline, country of origin author. Data Web of Science and Altmetric.com . Use the DOI to search both. In Altmetric can see where the tweets originate. They used thresholds to deal with outliers. Used tweets and citations from 2012 to 2015. Since there were some papers with very few tweeted papers, these would be difficult to compare. Used journals with at least 10 tweeted and 10 non-tweeted papers. ... also did threshold with 100 and 100 - in this case of 308 journals, 36% papers tweeted. Tweeted papers receive 68.4% more citations on average than non-tweeted (not corrected). Corrected by journal 30% citation advantage (significant at p<0.05). By discipline - varies - significant in 9 disciplines - not significant in chem, engr, human, math due to sample size. Source countries (based on author institution) - threshold level. Country with top tweeted - Netherlands. Sweden 91% citation advantage.

Citation advantage 30%, in all disciplines but extent varies.

Most tweets are from 6 months after publication

Chris Hubbles (speaker), David W. McDonald, & Jin Ha Lee - F#%@ That Noise: SoundCloud As (A-)Social Media?

SoundCloud is used to share and communicate about music. Has timestamped commenting and allows social interaction among fans woven into the playback feature. Used to distribute music, podcasts, and even some government organizations. "Social Multimedia" . Qualitative content analysis on these comments. Used search API (ID popular tracks) and then track API to pull all the comments for these tracks. Whole year of 2013. 100-200 tracks per day uploaded except for a weird spike. They removed from the sample spoken word. Kept 0-10 miutes, 10-500 comments. Collaboratively coded by authors. Codebook with 39 codes.  58 songs, 5,608 comments. 69% electronic music and hip-hop. Music was uploaded by artists, labels, promotion companies, fans, etc.  Comments were mostly positive. Were full of profanity, caps, emoji, exclamation points. But also about features of the music, and stories of where the music was heard and what it meant. Few of the comments were part of conversation threads. One track had 77 comments with no replies. Uploader replies were almost as common as fan replies.

Similar to what Dana Rotman found with YouTube. The presence of affordances doesn't mean will form community.

The display could be better to support participation.

"A-social party" - expression and not interaction. Broadcasting, graffiti, co-presence, mutually shared experience.

Quan Zhou, Chei Sian Lee (Speaker), & Sei-Ching Joanna Sin - Using Social Media in Formal Learning: Investigating Learning Strategies and Satisfaction

Self-regulated learning (Pintrich, 2000, p453) - "an active constructive process whereby learners set goals ... then monitor regulate... constrained by ...goals... environment". forethought, performance control, self-reflection

survey  - undergrad and grad students, if they used social media for any class, standard scales for learning strategies and satisfaction... n=270

PCA and regression. all 4 learning strategies significant. Goal setting most influential predictor of learning satisfaction. Self-evaluation second (social comparison - is a motivating force, unlike general studies of social media where comparison makes you unhappy). Keep in mind, their students are maybe more highly motivated than some other samples.

Limitations - didn't look at whether use was voluntary or mandatory. one university

q: how did you define social media? big list

q: did you ask for how the social media were used in the class? (no, not really?)

No responses yet

ASIST 2017: Digital Literacy in the Era of Fake News: Key Roles for Information Professionals

(by Christina Pikas) Oct 30 2017

They were having problems with the projector so started with Connaway going through studies they've done related to information literacy. Important to provost and universities - learning doesn't stop when students graduate. How do we get students to use public libraries and use information in every day life decisionmaking.

  • How do people who work with the public in libraries get updated on information literacy
  • What do students know about how search engines work
  • How do people assess information on the web and in social media

Heidi Julien - engage in issues and model approaches

  • social media campaign about facts
  • express views publicly and stand up to confront misinformation
  • educate representatives at all levels of government - these issues are important and institutions like library need to be supported
  • advocate for importance of digital literacy.
  • Aldous Huxley "facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored"
  • (other international infographics and things to share)

Seadle - information professionals provide context and nuanced view.

 

Alex Kasprak - Science Writer at Snopes.com

Some things they're seeing are more like overblown - Yellowstone volcano may erupt sooner... > we're all gonna die!

More things like autism/vaccination.

Deeper expose on retired scientist who is peddling snake oil cure for cancer.

"50 studies say... " - he's never found one of these in which the studies do support the claim

Recent from B saying 400 articles saying climate change a hoax. Kasprak asked author "how long did it take to prepare" and Delingpole said "as little time as possible" (can share this because Delingpole posted that an "impertinent pup" from Snopes was fact-checking him with this comment).

questions: debunking - is it really useful or is it just giving more attention? Snopes won't necessary solve the problem but serve as a reference and affect the financial viability of these sites. Real world implications when Snopes debunks.

is it really about believing things that are untrue or is it more taking away debate - yes

is the term "fake news" too charged now to use. yes - probably not a useful term

other terms: lazy journalism, hucksterism, pseudoscience, etc. use more precise term

more blame on producers - but can we increase the cost of being wrong (reposting these stories)

Habermas-ian - public sphere as a place for exchange of rational ideas - but with Foucalt hat on if our problem is trying to maintain this notion of civil society in the face of people who are no longer interested in the ideal. The rational argument against an emotional or financial gain... beat our head against the wall.

Seadle response - like both schools of thought. but people aren't rational. behavioral economics. pure number of hits on a website gets you more money. Incentive structures to bring people back to

Julien - we are beating our heads against the wall, multiple cognitive biases, all operating in our own echo chambers - ideal

My q: influence operations by state actors vs. this

Kasprak - the state actors were taking messages already existing or making new messages modeled on existing, and then amplifying, paying to target these. So combating is actually similar, but we're not winning, and there are higher numbers.

 

 

No responses yet

Poster for METRICS2017: Methods for Bibliometric Institutional Profiles for the Practitioner

(by Christina Pikas) Oct 29 2017

The poster:

I don't know if is actually clear enough to read? This big PDF should work: Pikas Methods for Bibliometric Institutional Profiles for the Practitioner

The submission has a little more about my motivation in the poster: Pikas Institutional Profiles MET17 (pdf)

The scripts are here: https://github.com/cpikas/institutionalprofiles

Here's a lovely map I had to cut from the poster for size. Viewers may not appreciate that it is actually very unusual for us to collaborate outside of the US.

Affiliations of co-authors, sized by number of articles.

No responses yet

ASIST2017 METRICS PM

(by Christina Pikas) Oct 27 2017

Edwin Henneken, Alberto Accomazzi, Sergio Blanco-Cuaresma, August Muench, Lars Holm Nielsen Asclepias – Capturing Software Citations in Astronomy

Asclepias project. Enabling software citation & discovery workflows. To "promote scientific software into an identifiable, citable, and preservable object. " Adding DOI based software citations to ADS. Tracking events.

Collaborative Codebase (GitHub) > Repository (Zenodo) > software broker (harvests repositry events, software citations

example corner.py (triangle.py) - published in JOSS, 60 regular citations to, but also deposited in Zenodo. Citations to every single version of the software and a total of 100 citations.

Journals need to be able to accept software citations (actual citation to the software and not a related article). Just slapping a doi on it isn't enough.

End to end go from original proposal through all the data, papers, software, etc. and have analytics along the way.

Q: difficult to get people doing the right thing with the repositories? yes - but astro is amenable. long history of linking data

Q2: like bigger world of citing things not papers about things? yes

Eto MasakiIncreasing Source Documents of Rough Co-citation to Expand Co-citation Networks for Scientific Paper Searches

rough co-citation is a generation back from co-citation.

a + b cited together, co-citation... a+c cited together infer relationship with b, this did increase information retrieval retrieved documents that didn't exist in the network.

Pei-Ying Chen (speaker), Erica Hayes, Stefanie Haustein, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto -  Politics of platforms: the ideological perspectives of social reference manager users on scholarly communication

Looking at Mendeley and Zotero - hypothesis that Zotero users will be more to open data, etc., and Mendeley will be more traditional bcs using corporate platform.

Mendeley provided a stratified random sample of 26k users, response from about 1200. Zotero was an anonymous link advertised by Zotero at conferences.

In survey they didn't provide a category for librarians so they got a lot of "others"

From both groups: all advocate for open source software, all adopter of new technologies, most advocate for open access.

Majority of both think peer review system is broken and publishers aren't necessary for scholarly communication.

Some similarities and differences, but no real clear support for their hypothesis, as far as I could tell.

Q: try to look at the contents of the library to see if more oa or paywall journals?

 

Eshan Mohammadi, Mike Thelwall, Kristi Holmes - Interpret the meaning of academic tweets: A multi-disciplinary survey

Altmetrics - who uses twitter to communicate scholarly info, does twitter play an important role in communicating scholarly info, why, does it depend on discipline

twitter users who re/tweeted academic publications at least once using altmetric.com 4.5m twitter accounts

looked at personal web page urls 1.7 urls

using webmining, identified emailaddresses

sent online survey to 57k twitter users, got 2000 responses.

most respondents tweeting scholarly information were from the social sciences and humanities

most agree:

  • change way to read and disseminate sci info
  • twitter facilitates knowledge flows
  • reflects research impact
  • share academic findings with the general public

motivations for using and type of content shared depend on discipline, occupation and employment sector

They have a paper under review in a journal so stand by.

 

Philippe Mongeon Is there a Matilda effect in academic patenting?

We know men publish more papers than women and their papers are more cited

Now for patenting. Only about 15% of inventors are women. Patent-paper pairs. Same discovery published in a paper and patent

are women less likely to be inventor than men when we control for: position on the byline, discipline, reputation, contribution

Previous studies: no gender difference (Haeusslet & Sauermann, 2013), female more likely excluded from inventorship (Lissoni et al 2013)

all articles with 2 or more authors in wos 1991-2016, uspto patent applications 1986-2015

papers patents -1 to 5 years of app, all inventors on the actors list

text similarity of title and abstract.

discipline - based on discipline of journals cited by the paper

attribution of gender - based on Wikipedia pages (Berube in preparation)

automatic disambiguation of authors

accumulated number of citations at time of app.

contributions - manual extraction, where there were statements coded conception, analysis, performed...

regression models...

turns out place in author list has much more impact than gender, but gender is significant for all but engineering.

When taking contribution into account (many fewer papers), conception role is important  - which makes sense.

Small effect of gender on the attribution of inventorship, gender gap occurring earlier in the research process

 

No responses yet

Older posts »